When I read the news, I often say to myself that the statement should be the reverse: For Example: New York Times, Sunday July 5, 2009. The -----party portrays the climate bill as a flawed threat to the economy. When I read that, I think that what they really should be thinking is: the Flawed economy is a threat to the climate. I guess we can cross that bridge when we get to it.
Sunday, July 5, 2009
News views
When I read the news, I often say to myself that the statement should be the reverse: For Example: New York Times, Sunday July 5, 2009. The -----party portrays the climate bill as a flawed threat to the economy. When I read that, I think that what they really should be thinking is: the Flawed economy is a threat to the climate. I guess we can cross that bridge when we get to it.
Subscribe to:
Post Comments (Atom)
1 comment:
I think the same way. Seems like lawmakers are in too many pockets and need to get out of the beltway more often.
Post a Comment